If you are like me and you are into using iBatis eclipse plugin - check out http://ibatis.apache.org/ibator.html. It comes with an eclipse plugin that is quite useful if you are working with the ibatis configuration files.
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Friday, July 17, 2009
Handling signals in Java
Signals by definition are specific to the underlying implementation ( read, operating system) .
Java, being a platform independent language , it is often discouraged to write platform specific stuff except for the rarest cases and when there is a clear business justification for the same.
Java does have an undocumented API that talks about signals where we can override the default signal handler for a given signal. Scenarios where this might be useful and necessary are when we try to release resources ( connections etc.).
Note: When we override default signal handlers, it is important to delegate the behavior to the default handler implementation (Hint: Save the old handler when overriding the same) after we finish the current implementation.
Java, being a platform independent language , it is often discouraged to write platform specific stuff except for the rarest cases and when there is a clear business justification for the same.
Java does have an undocumented API that talks about signals where we can override the default signal handler for a given signal. Scenarios where this might be useful and necessary are when we try to release resources ( connections etc.).
Note: When we override default signal handlers, it is important to delegate the behavior to the default handler implementation (Hint: Save the old handler when overriding the same) after we finish the current implementation.
package experiment;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import sun.misc.Signal;
import sun.misc.SignalHandler;
public class CustomSignalHandler implements SignalHandler
{
private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(CustomSignalHandler.class.getName());
private static Map<Signal, SignalHandler> handlers = new HashMap<Signal, SignalHandler>();
@Override
public void handle(Signal signal)
{
LOGGER.info("received " + signal);
// Delegate to the existing handler after handling necessary clean-up.
handlers.get(signal).handle(signal);
}
/**
* Important: This API is not portable but heavily platform dependent as the signal name depends
* on the underying operating system.
*
* @param signalName
* @param signalHandler
*/
public static void delegateHandler(final String signalName,
final SignalHandler signalHandler)
{
try {
Signal signal = new Signal(signalName);
SignalHandler oldhandler = Signal.handle(signal, signalHandler);
} finally {
handlers.put(signal, oldhandler);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
final int LONG_TIME = 50000;
SignalHandler example = new CustomSignalHandler();
delegateHandler("TERM", example);
delegateHandler("INT", example);
delegateHandler("ABRT", example);
try
{
Thread.sleep(LONG_TIME);
}
catch (InterruptedException ie)
{
ie.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Advanced Linux Programming
There is a new free e-book on advanced linux programming available here at - http://www.advancedlinuxprogramming.com/alp-folder .
The chapter list is as follows.
The chapter list is as follows.
- Chapter 01 - Advanced Unix Programming with Linux
- Chapter 02 - Writing Good GNU/Linux Software
- Chapter 03 - Processes
- Chapter 04 - Threads
- Chapter 05 - Interprocess Communication
- Chapter 06 - Mastering Linux
- Chapter 07 - The /proc File System
- Chapter 08 - Linux System Calls
- Chapter 09 - Inline Assembly Code
- Chapter 10 - Security
- Chapter 11 - A Sample GNU/Linux Application
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Segmentation Fault - but no core dump ?
When I was working on a given binary - it gave me a "Segmentation Fault" but no core dump.
Started with the usual suspects .
* Checked the permission of the directory to see if the user has write permission to write the core file. It was ok.
* Checked the /tmp directory just in case.
Then I realized that I was working on bash, that sets core file size to be 0 automatically.
Reset the same as below
Now I ran my executable again and yes , this time the core dump is available for processing.
Started with the usual suspects .
* Checked the permission of the directory to see if the user has write permission to write the core file. It was ok.
* Checked the /tmp directory just in case.
Then I realized that I was working on bash, that sets core file size to be 0 automatically.
$ ulimit -a core file size (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited scheduling priority (-e) 20 ..
Reset the same as below
$ ulimit -c unlimited
Now I ran my executable again and yes , this time the core dump is available for processing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)